Lincoln-Douglas Debate is one of the most popular events in NCFCA. The event is a one-on-one debate format that centers on a value resolution announced by the league. Monument writes source material based on the resolution, which is:
Resolved: When in conflict, governments should value fair trade above free trade.
Earlier NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Releases
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #19: “The Free Trade Lie” (AFF) (12/10/2018) - This is an aggressive contention-centric case that relies on solid analysis, concreate persuasion, and good numbers to win the debate round. While most affirmative cases right now are focused on a wonky definition of fair trade, or an idealistic value, this case takes the negative right where they want to go: the economy.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #18: “Consensus” (NEG) (12/3/2018) - This Negative case shows competitor's how to win on applications when their opponent brings up anecdotal examples and feel-good quotes, students want to be the one who shows the judge the truth.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #17: “Justice” (AFF) (11/26/2018) - The Negative will want to limit free trade to only nice and pretty and moral things. You want to show the morally bankrupt potential of free trade without the moral boundaries that fair trade offers.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #16: “Government Responsibility” (NEG) (11/19/2018) - The resolution explicitly mandates you debate within the confines of a government actor. This case attempts to leverage every implication of that.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #15: “Ethics” (AFF) (11/12/2018) - This affirmative case constructs the following premises: ethics is the highest goal, free trade is unrestricted, and fair trade is restricted for the purpose of ethics.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #14: “Peace” (NEG) (11/5/2018) - Not a huge fan of economics? Then this case is for you. It avoids looking at the resolution through an economic lens and instead considers the international political implications of fair trade versus free trade. Peace (the value) is the ultimate, foundational value that governments have a duty to promote.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #13: “Fair Trade is Not Impartial” (NEG) (10/29/2018) - This negative case will not reduce the debate to capitalism and socialism. Instead, we’re going to argue that valuing fair trade over free trade leads to inherent bias in the market. The destruction of justice and impartiality inevitably leads to a loss of economic growth and consumer trust.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #12: “Prosperity” (NEG) (10/22/2018) - In this negative case, you will make the argument that prosperity is best achieved (on a personal and a national level) through fair trade and a free market system. The value is prosperity and it is your job to defend the ethical and economic principles that prosperity achieves.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #11: “Human Dignity” (AFF) (10/15/2018) - This download is a LD affirmative case with two main applications; child labor in the cocoa industry and the sweatshops caused by the cheap clothing market. Each illustrates what happens when we allow unrestrained trade to promote profits over human dignity.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #10: “General Welfare” (NEG) (10/8/2018) - The negative side of this resolution has the unique opportunity to use nearly all the influential economists of history to support its side. This case sets up debaters to use this potential credibility to their advantage.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #09: “General Welfare” (AFF) (10/1/2018) - Fair Trade is an economic philosophy centered around helping those at the bottom of the production process. This case argues that fair trade provides guidelines for conditions and wages that increase the standards of living for workers who make the goods we use every-day.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #08: “Charity” (NEG) (9/24/2018) - This case takes the conventional understanding of free versus fair trade and turns it on its head. We typically see fair trade portrayed as extending a helping hand towards the poor, ensuring responsible production. Buying fair trade coffee almost feels like donating to charity.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #07: “Prosperity” (AFF) (9/17/2018) - This case tells the familiar story of a middle class that's dying at the hand of liberal economic policies. It takes its persuasive power from anecdotes that many judges can relate too. Your rhetoric doesn't need to be flashy; the narrative sells itself.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #06: “Property” (NEG) (9/10/2018) - The simple way to run this negative case is very straightforward. You set the table with your resolutional analysis, clear the table by emphasizing your value and then capitalize on the fact that your judge is personally affected by rising prices on restricted goods.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #05: “Quality of Life” (AFF) (9/3/2018) - This case aims to ensure that the affirmative has a moral high ground in the debate. The rhetoric specifically questions the ethical validity of a negative position, while suggesting that affirmative better takes in to account the well-being of all people.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #04: “Applications” (INFO) (8/27/2018) - This article is about applying the resolution to real life. When the judge receives your arguments, how will he compare them to what he has already seen and experienced? This article gives you the tools to ensure that you can persuade judges to your side.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #03: “Philosophies to the Resolution” (INFO) (8/20/2018) - Economics needs philosophy. To grapple with the crucial issues of the NCFCA LD resolution this year, you need to transcend the typical conception of economics and infuse it with philosophical understanding. This article equips you to do just that.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #02: “Strategies” (INFO) (8/13/2018) - This article will evaluate the factors of a conflict resolution, importance of a government actor, the meaning behind the ideologies of fair trade and free trade, and how to make a general case for each side of the resolution.
- NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #01: “Resolution Overview” (INFO) (8/6/2018) - This article gives insight to this year's NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas resolution by giving your some basics on what competitors need to know about free trade, fair trade and economic analysis.
- Preseason: Lincoln-Douglas Debate (6/10/2018) - This preseason document introduces you to the most exciting competitive event of Lincoln-Douglas Debate.This lesson gives students the structure, explanation and this year's Lincoln-Douglas resolution.
Season 19 Release Schedule
Monument releases content every Monday morning through four quarters (2 semesters). Each quarter contains hundreds of releases, custom written to specific leagues and events, totaling 500 guaranteed releases for the entire year. Click here for preseason and free downloads. The school season is as follows:
- Quarter 1 • Starts August 6, 2018
Ten releases for 14 events and categories. Events include Policy Debate, Lincoln-Douglas, Public Forum, Parliamentary Debate, Extemp, Apologetics, Platform and Interpretation. Perfect to start your journey through the competitive year.
- Quarter 2 • Starts October 15, 2018
Releases continue, this time with case and brief development for speakers and debaters in policy, value, parli and all the speech events. Perfect for those who want to be transformed into champion competitors for the first tournaments of the year.
- Quarter 3 • Starts January 7, 2019
Members are delivered more specific negative and opposition briefs. Eleven different events and categories for 220 additional downloads throughout the year. Perfect for debaters who need to own the source content to maximize their competitive success.
- Quarter 4 • Starts March 18, 2019
The home stretch through state, regional and national championships, the fourth quarter releases additional downloads for those speakers and debaters who are ready to win. Perfect for those who need additional help to differentiate themselves from other champions.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.