NOTE: This download expired May 31, 2018. See message below.
Summary: This case attempts to narrow down this broad resolution as much as possible by examining the resolution in an entirely economic scale.
Released: Filed Under: Archives
About "Prosperity (NEG)"
This article was written by Season 18 author Nathaniel Van Eeckhout.
This case attempts to narrow down this broad resolution as much as possible by examining the resolution in an entirely economic scale. Instead of focusing on societal contacts and governmental philosophy, it simply asks which side of the resolution is better apt to help a nation grow fiscally. Understandably, economic prosperity should benefit a nation in a variety of different ways.
To win with this case, you first have to set up the definitions. I would recommend using a portion of cross-examination time to see if your opponent may agree with a variation of these definitions or, at the very least, that globalism opens up cooperation with other countries.
Also, stay on your ground. This case is designed to be as simple and easy to understand as possible. If you run away from the framework of economics, you’ll likely lose the round. However, with good statistics to back up yourself up in rebuttals, and an ability to hold your turf, this case offers promise.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 18. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- NEW FEATURE! Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.