NOTE: This download expired May 31, 2018. See message below.
Summary: This case prioritizes nationalism as the only way to ensure all opinions are respected.
Released: Filed Under: Archives
About "Minority Opinion (AFF)"
A common perception of nationalism is that it’s anti-diversity. People think of Hitler or Trump and conclude that nationalists only want to protect their own kind. This case turns that perception on its head. It argues that the best way to preserve different cultures is by allowing countries to abide by their cultural beliefs, even if those beliefs represent the minority of the globe.
It makes this argument by viewing nationalism as exercising national sovereignty, while globalism is viewed as infringement upon that sovereignty. Furthermore, it uses its definitions to put the resolution into a policy perspective. The value is Minority Opinion. Basically, protecting a nation’s sovereignty allows it to exercise its opinion even when most of the world disagrees with it.
Now, many NEGs will object to the idea that valuing globalism means taking away national sovereignty. This means that most of your battle will be fought defending your definitions. The resolutional analysis is based on the definitions, so it’s important that your definitions stand.
If you can hold your ground on this framework, you’ve got an easy win. This case frames the conflict in a way that makes nationalism obviously reasonable. Global cooperation is good, but countries should get to choose when and how they participate in it. Who would want to argue with that? Furthermore, it makes globalism look obviously unreasonable. International powers-that-be stripping smaller nations of their cultures? How could anyone advocate for that?
The application of globalism disrespecting minority opinion is hard hitting. However, NEG might argue that it’s an extreme example. Use your framework to explain how globalism inherently leads to this kind of abuse. Prioritizing nationalism is the only way to ensure all opinions are respected.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.
Shaylea is an NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas debater entering her 3rd year of competition. She ranked 17th in Lincoln-Douglas at the NCFCA 2017 National Championship in St. Paul, Minnesota. She’s enthusiastic about Lincoln-Douglas debate as a tool to enhance students’ understanding of the philosophies that shape our world.