Released: Filed Under: NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas
About "Tariffs Good"
Tariffs are an example often used to illustrate how “unfair” fair trade is. Despite the claim that tariffs are harmful, the evidence shows that tariffs can have a positive impact.
In NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas Release #06: “Property” (NEG) (9/10/2018) Mark Csoros writes:
Mark Perry of the American Enterprise Institute wrote in 2016 that
“…protectionist trade policies like a 266% tariff provide significant, concentrated benefits for a small number of well-organized, rent-seeking domestic firms like Big Steel…. but at the expense of much higher costs and possible job losses that are imposed on hundreds of millions of disorganized and dispersed consumers and the domestic firms that use steel as an input.”
When the government puts tariffs on steel, it’s imposing a tax designed to help a certain class of citizen, specifically those who work in the American steel industry. But that benefit comes at a cost to the property of every other American, who now has to pay more for any product that used steel as an input. Every paycheck is now worth less, because the cost of cars, construction, and cutlery has now increased.
Mark uses the example of tariffs to argue that fair trade is unfair. This opposition brief gives you evidence to dispute that. The evidence in this brief goes from broad to specific. First, this brief argues that tariffs help countries become successful. Next it gives examples of how tariffs are useful tool. Finally, there is evidence in favor of the recent tariffs implemented by president Trump.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.
For the past 4 years Naomi competed in Policy and Lincoln-Douglas debate in NCFCA, consistently winning awards and qualifying to nationals in both categories. She also enjoyed doing Parliamentary debate in Stoa and forensics through the Wisconsin State league. Her love of research transcends the world of competitive debate, and she looks forward to studying political science and economics at Truman State University this fall.