NOTE: This download expired May 31, 2018. See message below.
Summary: This brief gives you the tools to argue that the US revolution was motivated by nationalism, and that it illustrates the power of strong nations to promote human rights by furthering their interests.
Released: Filed Under: Expired
About "The U.S. Revolution (OPP)"
Let’s face it. It’s hard to make nationalism look good. Negative can easily throw out examples of dictatorships or ineffective isolationist states and claim that’s what nationalism is. In these cases of injustice, negative argues we should reject national interests, like the colonists rejected Britain when they felt their rights were being ignored.
The US Revolution is a powerful example. If the negative can tie it to globalist (or at least anti-nationalist) motivations, they can make their case sound very persuasive. In this brief, I’ll give you the tools to argue that the US revolution was motivated by nationalism, and that it illustrates the power of strong nations to promote human rights by furthering their interests.
First, you must establish that the Revolution is an example of nationalism, starting by pointing out the disconnect between Britain and the colonies, which you can support by explaining salutary neglect.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.
Shaylea is an NCFCA Lincoln-Douglas debater entering her 3rd year of competition. She ranked 17th in Lincoln-Douglas at the NCFCA 2017 National Championship in St. Paul, Minnesota. She’s enthusiastic about Lincoln-Douglas debate as a tool to enhance students’ understanding of the philosophies that shape our world.