Released: Filed Under: NCFCA Policy
The United States has military forces in Afghanistan to fight terrorism. The Affirmative case argues that further military efforts in Afghanistan are futile, the war is unwinnable, fueling corruption in the Afghan government, and withdrawal would save money and lives. Negative will argue that withdrawing our forces would lead to a much worse future. The Status Quo is effectively fighting terrorism there, and if corruption is a problem, US presence is the best way to fight it. There would be a resurgent Taliban with increased terrorism, human rights would be threatened, and America would lose its honor by withdrawing.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.
Kathryn has done three years of policy debate. She absolutely hated debate her first year, but started enjoying it her second year when she and her partner placed third at a tournament as well as qualifying for NITOC. Her third year, she and her partner placed second, third, and then first in policy for the three tournaments she and her partner attended. Research is definitely her favorite part of debate.