NOTE: This download expired May 31, 2018. See message below.
Summary: This brief counters the plan that attempts to reform Title IX.
Released: Filed Under: Archives
About "Title IX Sexual Assault (NEG)"
Affirmative plan reforms Title IX by mandating reporting all incidents of sexual harassment and assault known by university faculty to law enforcement agencies as well as reversing the Office for Civil Rights’ mandates concerning the interpretation of Title IX. AFF wants to ensure that colleges get out of the business of adjudicating sexual harassment/assault cases and turn everything over immediately to the police.
The “preponderance of evidence” standard is what colleges are using to determine if someone is guilty of sexual assault today. This means they will punish the accused if they believe there’s a 51% chance that he is guilty. A courtroom would use a standard of “beyond reasonable doubt” – perhaps something like 99.9% chance. Along with other things in the university investigation, Affirmative argues that these low standards are unfair to the accused. Neg can argue:
1) Minor Repair: Modify the standard to “clear and convincing” (halfway between preponderance and beyond doubt) and keep the college Title IX investigations, rather than abolishing them. And/OR
2) The standards are just fine the way they are because they already protect rights. And/OR
3) The standards are low because they are intentionally not courtroom standards, because colleges are not prosecuting anyone for a crime, just determining whether to kick someone out of college. Colleges do that all the time for lots of offenses (e.g. drinking alcohol) and they don’t have to follow courtroom procedures for it.
 An earlier version was unclear and confused some of our readers when we said: “This means there’s a 51% chance that the accused is guilty.”
NOTE: A special supplement was published 9/26/16 to address Betsy DeVos’ recantation of the “Dear Colleague” letter. Click here for that supplement.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.
Jake Johnson loves debating and encouraging people to rationally and logically defend their worldviews and positions. He competed in Stoa for six years and placed 1st in Policy Debate and 2nd in Parliamentary Debate at NITOC in 2017.