NOTE: This download expired May 31, 2018. See message below.
Summary: In response to the Employer Participation case, Negatives will argue that this is merely another subsidy for the rich that we don’t need.
Released: Filed Under: Archives
About "Employer Participation (NEG)"
The AFF case enacts a bill currently pending in Congress that creates tax deductions for employer contributions to an employee’s student debt (similar to tax free contributions made currently to employee 401(k) retirement accounts). Its theory is that creating this rule will incentivize employers (who will get a tax break) to make student debt reduction part of their employee benefits package, helping graduates get out of debt and helping the federal government get paid back for all that borrowed money that sometimes folks have trouble paying back.
Negatives will argue that this is merely another subsidy for the rich that we don’t need. First, you have to be working to get employer debt relief. But the people who need help the most are the ones not working. They could be unemployed due to hard economic circumstances or because they couldn’t finish their education and now have big debt and no degree, and therefore no pathway toward getting a job to pay the debt back. There are also lots of Status Quo programs to help (all) people pay off or manage student debt, so there’s no need to create yet another program. New statistics show these programs, and changing economic trends, are already working to solve the student debt problem today. Creating new tax breaks to pay down student debt at taxpayer expense will only create incentives for students to run up more debt and make worse the harms AFF was trying to solve.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.
Coach Vance debated in National Forensic League debate while in high school from 1979-1982. In college, he judged at high school NFL tournaments in North Carolina. A homeschooling dad himself, he realized the growing potential and benefit of homeschool debate and switched over to coaching homeschoolers a couple years later. In 2001, he helped Chris Jeub with bringing The Blue Book to a more advanced level. He has been co-authoring Blue Book ever since.