NOTE: This download expired May 31, 2018. See message below.
Summary: AFF argues that colleges with big endowments are hoarding the money and not helping poor students with tuition. This brief argues that both of these policy changes are unnecessary and harmful.
Released: Filed Under: Expired
About "5 Percent"
5% Rule: Aff requires endowments to spend 5% of their total sum every year. Endowments earn income, of which the spending counts toward the 5%. If the endowment earns more than 5%, the rest accumulates and grows the endowment. If not, the endowment declines in value.
Note: Some versions of this case use an 8% rule instead of 5%. There is expert advocacy for both, but more evidence supporting 5% rather than 8%. Much of the evidence will cross apply to both, but some is specific to 8%.
REDUCE Act: A law proposed by Rep. Tom Reed (R-NY) requiring colleges with endowments of over $1 billion or totaling over $500k/student to spend 25% of the income (not 25% of the endowment, just the income) on student aid.
AFF argues that colleges with big endowments are hoarding the money and not helping poor students with tuition. But both of these policy changes are unnecessary and harmful. Most college endowments are already spending adequately and are not misers as the AFF claims. Endowments aren’t like money in the bank that you can spend on anything. Many of the funds donated are earmarked by their donors for specific purposes (e.g.: a new library, a professorship in some specific subject, a sports stadium, etc.) and cannot legally be diverted to student aid. Mandatory endowment spending will hurt colleges financially in the long run and will not help poor students like the AFF intends.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.
Katherine Baker studied team-policy debate for five years before graduating, enjoying much success and qualifying for NITOC in various events. She loves working on debate and sharing her knowledge with others, most grateful for the life lessons speech and debate has taught her.