Released: Filed Under: NSDA Lincoln-Douglas
About "Free Speech"
This case, in essence, consists of you asking the judge why citizens should be compelled by their government to speak. After all, compelling speech is the same as controlling speech, and requiring the names of confidential sources to be released is the same as compelling speech. All done.
But wait, there’s more. You will need to acknowledge that there are exceptions to the First Amendment, but they are used sparingly and only to protect life or other rights. Causing a riot or inciting violence aren’t protected forms of speech, because they threaten the rights of others. Libel (spreading false information to destroy someone’s reputation) is illegal, because knowingly lying to harm another person is unacceptable.
Along the same vein, keeping sources confidential may preserve quality of live for thousands of people. It would be hard to speak to a reporter about corruption at your job if you knew your boss could identify you. It would be hard to share your experience as an ex-gang member if you knew your name would pop up on the gang’s radar. Keeping a source confidential is more often a protection for the source than for the journalist.
Remember that your opponent has an all-or-nothing stance thrust upon him. He has to argue that under no circumstances should reporters be allowed to use confidential sources. You, on the other hand, only need to argue that reporters should have the freedom to choose whether or not to disclose sources. In most cases, reporters do directly quote their sources. In some cases, reporters choose to keep anonymity for their sources. Since those reporters are on the ground, dealing with the people whose names that may need protecting, the reporters are best able to decide what to publish and what to withhold. Government policy is monolithic and clumsy, and it doesn’t make sense to let Washington dictate strategies to individual reporters.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.
Mark’s competitive history includes top awards in policy, Lincoln-Douglas, parli, extemp, and apologetics in NCFCA and Stoa. He is currently an honors student at the University of Texas, dual-majoring in the Plan II Honors Program and the School of Business. Through his connections with forensics and writing for Monument, Mark earned an internship at the Texas Civil Justice League, where his research aims to increase stability and fairness in Texas’ civil justice system. In his spare time, Mark plays for UT’s rugby team.