NOTE: This download expired May 31, 2018. See message below.
Summary: The framework in this case is critical to victory, so three robust links support it. Critically, it emphasizes the voluntary nature of plea bargaining – and uses that explanation not only as mitigation (because plea bargaining seems far less unjust if everyone freely chooses it) but also as offense.
Released: Filed Under: Archives
This case is aggressive. Affirmatives will attempt to cast plea bargaining as a heinous violation of justice; to maintain strategic advantage in the round, you need to regain persuasive momentum. After you’ve re-weighted the judge’s presumption with the resolutional analysis, accomplishing that goal requires two things: a new framework, and heavy-duty mitigation. The framework in this case is critical to victory, so three robust links support it. Critically, it emphasizes the voluntary nature of plea bargaining – and uses that explanation not only as mitigation (because plea bargaining seems far less unjust if everyone freely chooses it) but also as offense. This offense is where you regain momentum; you’re running a hard turn on plea bargaining, not just running disadvantages to aff implementation, but arguing that its presence in the justice system is an indispensable boon. You can run pragmatic DAs on the aff plan as responses to their case, but this framework and contention gives you positive advocacy for plea bargaining that they’ll need to spend valuable time engaging with.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.
Following an illustrious debate career in the NCFCA, Chris enrolled at Grove City College in the Fall of 2016, where he currently holds a fellowship to study philosophy. He coaches for and competes on the Grove City Parliamentary Debate Team, for which he secured a national speaking title in March 2017. In his spare time, he enjoys playing gigs as a member of the GCC string quartet.