Released: Filed Under: Parliamentary Debate
On November 2nd, arguments for the Harvard race-based admissions trial concluded. The defendant was Harvard University, the plaintiff was Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), and at stake was Harvard’s controversial system of selecting applicants for admittance into one of America’s most prestigious universities. The system is designed to prioritize diversity on Harvard’s campus, which often means that black and Latino minorities get a slight boost up and over the threshold. Since the SCOTUS rulings on Fischer vs. the University of Texas (“rulings” is pluralized, since Fisher was decided twice, in 2013 and 2016), colleges have been able to use “race-sensitive” admissions models, if those models are not discriminatory. The problem is that Harvard’s model seems to discriminate against Asian-American applicants, hence the lawsuit from SFFA. This presents a quandary: diversity of experience and ideas is a good thing, but how can you favor students from one race without discriminating against students from another? The Harvard decision has not yet been handed down, and though both parties are prepared to appeal, we have a rare opportunity to put ourselves in a federal judge’s shoes. Debaters get to square off on the legality and ethics of affirmative action in this release.
This week’s topics of debate include identity politics, the impact of Beto O’Rourke’s Senate race, tensions with China, campus carry, the 17th Amendment, and historical scenario resolutions on Microsoft, the USSR, and SCOTUS.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.
Mark’s competitive history includes top awards in policy, Lincoln-Douglas, parli, extemp, and apologetics in NCFCA and Stoa. He is currently an honors student at the University of Texas, dual-majoring in the Plan II Honors Program and the School of Business. Through his connections with forensics and writing for Monument, Mark earned an internship at the Texas Civil Justice League, where his research aims to increase stability and fairness in Texas’ civil justice system. In his spare time, Mark plays for UT’s rugby team.