NOTE: This download expired May 31, 2018. See message below.
Summary: This case argues that governments are moral entities that can make decisions with definitive moral consequences.
Released: Filed Under: Archives
About "Oxygen Mask Self-defense"
Here’s a behind-the-scenes look at this case. First, we’re arguing that governments are moral entities. They can make decisions with definitive moral consequences. A government leaving us to die is an atrocity, and they are morally obligated to keep us safe. Bear in mind how aggressive this position is: it’s not simply saying that self-defense is acceptable, but that it is mandatory. Stick to your guns and don’t compromise this position.
When your opponent tries to counter with a broad value like human rights, identify if they believe governments should ever prioritize their citizens. If your opponent just advocates that governments protect all rights generically, then point out how problematic this is: it would be like paying a bodyguard to protect you and then watching him ditch you for someone else. In CX, ask if your opponent believes a nation’s own citizens deserve priority. If he says yes, then you can accept the value and point out that it is essentially the same as yours. Values like national security, domestic safety, etc., are no different from yours. You don’t need to win a wording quibble to get a logical advantage. Instead, point out how preemptive warfare prioritizes citizens through self-defense. The contention will win you the round.
A good number of your opponents will accept your value and simply say that preemptive warfare inhibits self-defense. It’s a coherent argument and one you must challenge.
But this is where subpoint magic kicks in. You illustrate three ways that preemptive warfare protects a nation. It’s the most balanced response to an imminent threat, inaction is downright irresponsible, and it’s the only option that sends a signal to other bullies on the playground. These are unique ways that preemptive warfare is self-defense, and since self-defense is morally justified, you prove the resolution true.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.
Joseph was the NITOC Tournament Champion in 2015, and the NCFCA Sweepstakes Champion in 2016. Now he’s the coach of a college team in Dallas and dozens of competitors across Stoa and NCFCA. With an undying passion for the activity, Joseph plans to remain at the cutting edge of speech and debate for as long as possible.