Summary: If you strip away the appealing rhetoric, most national security cases possess ample opportunity for the negative.
Released: Filed Under: Stoa Lincoln-Douglas
About "National Security (OPP)"
National Security is one of the most intuitive moral justifications for preemptive warfare. Because most judges readily accept the notion that governments are morally obligated to the safety of the country, national security makes a simple, easy, and effective value.
However, if you strip away the appealing rhetoric, most national security cases possess ample opportunity for the negative to deconstruct the foundational arguments and raise questions about the value and its efficacy in measuring preemptive warfare. In this brief you’ll find an abundance of arguments, applications, and evidence to run against any national security case.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 18. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- NEW FEATURE! Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.