Summary: AFF will argue that TSA is incompetent and inefficient and that private contractors or airport employees could do a better job.
Released: Filed Under: Stoa Policy
About "TSA Privatization (NEG)"
The Affirmative case removes TSA from the airport screening business and makes someone else (Blue Book’s case has airports, but others may make it the airlines) responsible for screening passengers and baggage. AFF will argue that TSA is incompetent and inefficient and that private contractors or airport employees could do a better job.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 18. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- NEW FEATURE! Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.