NOTE: This download expired May 31, 2019. See message below.
Released: Filed Under: Stoa Policy
About "LPR Food Aid"
The United States currently has over 90% of food for food aid bought in the US and then shipped to the needy countries. The Affirmative team’s claims are that if we were to switch to local and regional procurement (when you send money to the other country, and then they use it to buy food from local farmers), then they wouldn’t have to ship anything, food will get there several months faster, and they will save millions of lives. They also claim that Local and regional procurement (LRP) is cheaper, so more food can be bought at no additional cost, and that all of this happens while also helping local farmers.
Negative will argue that the U.S. already uses LRP so much that they are the world’s largest food aid LRP donor. Also, LRP isn’t always effective in all circumstances, and it can sometimes adversely affect markets and lead to higher costs in certain areas. That is why it is important to be able to choose which way to go. Negative also has the option of running the “Abolish Food Aid” counter-plan (provided in a separate brief).
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All Membership content and Library Archives are proprietary intellectual content, so please respect our copyrights. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member or a Library Access Owner you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited, the only exception being from immediate family members within a single household.
Rebecca Sumner has been debating for four years. She has qualified for team policy debate at NITOC for three years in a row. All three times, the qualification came within the first three tournaments.