NOTE: This download expired May 31, 2018. See message below.
Summary: AFF Plan requires mandatory motorcycle helmet laws at the state level, most likely by having the federal government withhold state highway funds for states not in compliance. This brief counters that.
Released: Filed Under: Archives
About "Motorcycle Helmets"
AFF Plan requires mandatory motorcycle helmet laws at the state level, most likely by having the federal government withhold state highway funds for states not in compliance. There are two main arguments usually given for the plan: 1) saves lives; 2) reduces social costs.
For #1, it’s hard to argue that helmets don’t save lives, and there probably aren’t any reliable studies that say they don’t. However, there is evidence that the savings are exaggerated and the benefits are insignificant. And the Neg will argue that the personal freedom to assume the risk for oneself outweighs the loss of life, since the one wearing or not-wearing the helmet is the only one affected by the decision. If “saving lives” were a sufficient justification for public policy, then the correct public policy would be to ban motorcycles (and cars too, for that matter). If the Affirmative will not advocate that, then they must admit that the benefits of freedom to ride or drive outweigh the risk of lives lost in both activities and that “saving lives” is not an absolute justification for public policy.
For #2, there are several responses. “Social costs” are expenses that are shifted to society whenever a rider has an accident and his medical costs are paid by someone else. This problem, though not significant, would easily be solved with a minor repair: Require all riders to carry adequate insurance. Many states already do, and the remaining states could minor repair their insurance laws to fix it. When that happens, each rider is completely paying the cost of his own decisions and there’s no impact to society.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.
Coach Vance debated in National Forensic League debate while in high school from 1979-1982. In college, he judged at high school NFL tournaments in North Carolina. A homeschooling dad himself, he realized the growing potential and benefit of homeschool debate and switched over to coaching homeschoolers a couple years later. In 2001, he helped Chris Jeub with bringing The Blue Book to a more advanced level. He has been co-authoring Blue Book ever since.