NOTE: This download expired May 31, 2018. See message below.
Summary: Affirmative plan mandates speed enforcement cameras every 5 miles on federally funded highways. This brief counters that.
Released: Filed Under: Archives
About "Speed Cameras"
Affirmative plan mandates speed enforcement cameras every 5 miles on federally funded highways. They would take a picture and timestamp of a car and measure the time it takes to get to the next camera to determine the speed of the car and issue an automatic citation for speed violations.
Since many states have rules banning such cameras, the plan would require extra-topical changes in state policies in order to implement and enforce the mandates. And the policy will be a massive waste of time and money and will distract us from efforts that would be far more likely to improve road safety.
All of the Affirmative’s evidence on “speed related accidents” should be dropped from the round unless it is specific to federally funded interstate highways. Sure, speed causes accidents, but the risks are far different on local roads where someone speeding through an intersection creates a hazard – compared to someone driving 75 on a high speed interstate highway where everyone is going the same direction at the same time. Those two risks aren’t even comparable and Affirmative evidence taken out of context from neighborhoods shouldn’t be used to justify policies on highways. Studies have found lower death rates in the US as highway speed limits have gone up, further cutting the link between highway speed and harm to motorists.
Enforcement of speed camera tickets is problematic. If you try to punish the driver, you have to take a picture of his face and hope you can determine who that is (with glare and reflections, etc. blocking the view), and then deal with judges who throw out such tickets because they violate the due process right to confront one’s accuser. If you send a ticket to the registered owner of the car, you’re punishing someone who the government cannot prove was driving, violating presumption of innocence, and courts are throwing out tickets for that reason as well.
- Download the document with the button above. Study this release and get to know it well. File and print as necessary to prepare for your upcoming competition.
- This download is exclusively for Monument Members participating in Season 19. Any use outside this membership is a violation of U.S. Copyright Law and violators will be prosecuted.
- As always, double check all claims, warrants, hyperlinks and the current news in case any changes have occurred that will affect your competition.
- Do you have questions about this download? Tap in your comment at the bottom of the page. The author, the site owner, or another member will most likely reply.
Permission & Usage
Click Here for complete information on permissions. All membership content is proprietary intellectual content, so please respect its copyright. Simply put, if you are not a Monument Member, you may not use it or share its content. If one partner of a debate team is a member and the other is not, the one who is a Monument Member must be the controller of the logins, downloads and incorporation of the Monument Membership material. Sharing logins is strictly prohibited.
Would you like to join?
Downloads like these don't grow on trees. They take hard work from experts. But we make it easy and affordable with a membership, and we'd love for you to join us! Fill out the fields below to be included in all that Season 19 has to offer:
Click here for more information.
Coach Vance debated in National Forensic League debate while in high school from 1979-1982. In college, he judged at high school NFL tournaments in North Carolina. A homeschooling dad himself, he realized the growing potential and benefit of homeschool debate and switched over to coaching homeschoolers a couple years later. In 2001, he helped Chris Jeub with bringing The Blue Book to a more advanced level. He has been co-authoring Blue Book ever since.