Attorney client privilege (ACP) sounds like a very complex and hard to understand application, but on its face its a very simple application, with a very simple goal. But as we know, simple arguments will often have simple responses. As we will discuss those responses.
Danielle Van Dam is an interesting application that serves as an emotional and impactful example. Affirmative will use this example to prove at least two things, we will discuss what those are later… but first let’s dive into what the context of the application is and what it is saying about the round.
This case is special because the definitions are operationally defined. Reason being is because of this season I’ve seen that flexible, understandable, and reasonable definitions have helped me a lot in rounds attain the judge’s understanding.
This case has a certain point of view when it comes to criminal procedure. That it is the important picture. I’ll be first referencing how to take this case and understand it, and then addressing special strategies that will help when using this case.