Stoa Lincoln-Douglas Debate: Human Flourishing (NEG)

You’ll have the advantage of common sense with this case. The idea that things should get better rather than staying the same is pretty intuitive, and the concept of economic growth seems inherently positive, even for people who know next to nothing about economics (like some of your judges will be). You need to reinforce this and prove that economic growth is a better goal than economic stability, that it will provide better outcomes and lead to greater human flourishing. Finally, don’t forget to impact your arguments to your audience. You’re not just debating theoretical concepts; you’re debating real-world issues that impact each person’s wellbeing. By siding with growth, we can create a better world and a healthier society for everyone. Keep focusing on how growth is the best path to human flourishing, and you’ve got a strong negative case.